Showing posts with label books. Show all posts
Showing posts with label books. Show all posts

Monday, March 3, 2008

Living Without Communicating

Here's a quick story from Donald Whitney in Spiritual Disciplines for the Christian Life:

I heard a story of a man who became a Christian during an evangelistic emphasis in a city in the Pacific Northwest. When he told his boss about it, his employer responded with, “That’s great! I am a Christian and have been praying for you for years!”

But the new believer was crestfallen. “Why didn’t you ever tell me?” he asked. “You were the very reason I have not been interested in the gospel all these years.”

“How can that be?” the boss wondered. “I have done my very best to live the Christian life around you.”

“That’s the point,” explained the employee. “You lived such a model life without telling me that it was Christ who made the difference, I convinced myself that if you could live such a good and happy life without Christ, then I could too.”

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Cups

One of the books I’m currently reading is The Cross He Bore: Meditations on the Sufferings of the Redeemer by Frederick S. Leahy. What I have appreciated about it is that for the size of the book, the author helps show how even some of the details I would be prone to overlook are of the utmost importance to the suffering of Christ, and how that fulfilled the Father’s wrath.

Such an example comes from the 11th chapter, where Leahy explains how important it was for Jesus to refuse the wine and myrrh/gall mixture offered to him while hanging on the cross.

First he explains how the cup of wrath needed to be kept pure.

Not only would the Saviour drink the cup of divine wrath, with its steadily increasing bitterness, but also, in terms of his suffering, he would drink no other cup, nor would he accept any admixture. He would drink the cup that the Father had given him unmixed. Not a solitary drop of any other potion must blend with that prepared by the Father. That cup must be kept pure.

He continues:

Dilute that cup with a single extraneous drop and it is no longer the cup of God’s wrath. For that matter, add one foreign ingredient to the cup of God’s mercy and it ceases to be such. God’s wrath and God’s mercy alike are unmixed.

Leahy then explains how the myrrh/gall was typically used to dull the pain of those being crucified. Christ refused the drink, because he needed to feel the full pain and suffering of the cross. As Leahy says, “Nothing must be allowed to insulate his spirit from the reality of the situation.”

He must suffer to the utmost. He must feel the full ‘sting’ of his death. No anesthetic was permissible.

Leahy continues by saying how by refusing the cup the soldiers offered, he was also refusing a cup Satan himself offered and then considers what would have happened if Jesus had drank the mixture.

Then, with a befuddled brain, he could not have prayed for the soldiers who were waiting to nail him to the cross. Then those seven great sayings on the cross would never have been uttered. Then his obedience would at last have been broken and all would have been lost. How much was at stake as they pushed the rim of that cup towards the Saviour’s lips! Everything! All of the divine decree, all of prophecy, all of redemption was at stake as that appealing cup was offered to the suffering one again and again.

Leahy concludes the chapter by pointing to Matthew 26:29, where Christ refused another cup, the sacramental cup, until the consummation. The sacramental cup we drink at communion as a relationship between “‘…commencement and fulfillment.’”

As we take the sacramental cup in our hands, may we be profoundly conscious that this is a foretaste of that heavenly banquet. Our thoughts might well be of the cup Christ drank, the cup he refused, and the cup from which he will drink with us in glory.

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

The Crown of Thorns

“Then the soldiers of the governor took Jesus into the governor’s headquarters, and they gathered the whole battalion before him. And they stripped him and put a scarlet robe on him, and twisting a together a crown of thorns, they put it on his head and put a reed in his right hand. And kneeling before him, they mocked him, saying, “Hail, King of Jews!” (Matthew 27:27-30 ESV)

“And they clothed him in a purple cloak, and twisting together a crown of thorns, they put it on him. And they began to salute him, “Hail, King of the Jews!” And they were striking his head with a reed and spitting on him and kneeling down in homage to him.” (Mark 15:17-19 ESV)

Brutal, terrible, vicious…but just how important was Christ’s crown of thorns? Frederick S. Leahy puts it this way in The Cross He Bore: Meditations on the Sufferings of the Redeemer:

If we are to receive the crown of life, Christ must receive the crown of thorns. He cannot be our Saviour any other way. That is what Krummacher means when he comments that in the crown of his deity alone, Christ could only say to a dying thief, ‘Be thou accursed’; but in the crown of thorns he can say, ‘This day shalt thou be with me in Paradise.’ In the crown of his deity alone, he can only say to a Magdalene or a publican, ‘Depart from me’; but in the crown of thorns he can say, ‘Go in peace, your sins are forgiven you.’ It is in his diadem of thorns that he stoops low in humiliation and shame and sorrow to seek and to save sinners. It is only by the sharp torn of his suffering that the poisonous thorn of our sin is drawn. In other words, apart from the cross God cannot forgive sin.

Leahy continues:

In this apparent weakness he is the mighty conqueror of Satan and sin and death, the overcomer of this world. The cross appears as foolishness to the world, but to God’s redeemed people the cross is victory, salvation, the power of God.

Friday, February 1, 2008

Preparing Ourselves to Hear the Word of God

Donald Whitney makes a great comment in Spiritual Disciplines for the Christian Life about where our heart should be as we are about to hear the Word of God preached on Sunday mornings. While not the main point of his chapter on Bible intake, he makes a fruitful digression.


If you enter the typical evangelical church two minutes before the start of the worship service, it sounds almost like you’ve walked into a gymnasium two minutes before a basketball game. Part of my pastoral heart appreciates the good things represented by people who are glad to see and talk with each other. There is a spirit of family reunion in the air when the family of God gathers together. But I think a larger part of my heart longs for reverence and a spirit of seeking God among those who come to hear His Word. (pg. 31)


Whitney continues, relating a story of a congregation of Korean Christians using his church building for their services.


I was impressed by the way they entered the worship center. Whether they were first to arrive or came in after the service had already started, they immediately bowed in prayer for several moments before arranging their belongings, unbuttoning their coat, or acknowledging the presence of anyone else. This served as an effective reminder to their own hearts and to everyone else of their main purpose for that time. (pg. 31)


Oh, how often I neglect to prepare my heart for corporate worship and the hearing of God’s Word on Sunday mornings. Oh, how easy it is for me to converse with others, or to even twiddle my thumbs aimlessly, instead of spending a few minutes with God in reverent prayer before the morning’s service begins. May God continue to pour out His grace on me so that I can approach his Word with more awe and reverence and thanksgiving!

Thursday, January 31, 2008

Morality (What I'm Reading)

I've recently been sifting through the pages of a rather interesting book on politics (thanks to one of my roommates who will go unnamed). Although it is a politically oriented book, its very interesting to someone like me who isn't the most politically oriented person. I typically spend most of my reading time reading Christian books (go figure), "Legislating Morality" by Norman Geisler and Frank Turek has been a welcomed change of pace. The authors argue that morality has to be legislated. In fact, it would be irrational or impossible to not legislate morality, even though there is a preconceived notion in this country that you can't legislate morality (later chapters deal with whose morality should be legislated).

The United States was founded on the principles of the Moral Law. You may think that this is a Christian thing, but its more of a human, commons sense sort of law. Let me explain with some quotes thoughts from the book.

"Do you remember how you felt the last time you were wronged--the last time someone took advantage of you and, for their own selfish gain, profited at your expense? Certainly that feeling of being treated unfairly came to you immediately. You knew intuitively that the other person was wrong, and any impartial observer--even a child-- would have agreed with you. You had an undeniable right to be upset, seek justice, and demand restitution from the guilty party".

The Founding Fathers understood this. People have no trouble distinguishing what is fair and what is unfair. A sense of injustice comes to us all quite naturally, particularly after someone wrongs us. In fact, you'll find this in the Declaration of Independence. "We hold these truths to be self-evident..." This same injustice came naturally to the Founding Fathers (I'm from Chile, but I have to admit these guys were pretty good). Let me finish that quote.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."

Anyways, this book is filled with all sorts of thoughts, history, and some jokes (for the politically savvy). I'll try and post some exerts from it and let me know what you think. Some great evangelism tools are present in the book although it is not a book on evangelism. I'll end with two quotes.

"...while the First Amendment clearly forbids the federal government from establishing a national religion, it does not prohibit the government from establishing a national morality. In fact, the First Amendment itself is a law that helps establish a national morality: it clearly implies that it is wrong for Congress to establish a religion or to prohibit the free exercise of religion; it also implies that any congressional attempt to abridge freedom of speech, the press, or assembly is morally wrong. The Founding Fathers obviously were convinced that it wold be for Congress to restrict these freedoms. In other words they believed these freedoms were morally right and needed to be protected through legislation."

and

"...we legislated and thus imposed one set of values on everyone in society, in order to protect the "unalienable Rights" of one segment of society. According to the Declaration of Independence, that is exactly what government is designed to do: "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men" "... "The issues gripping our country today--rights of the unborn, women's rights, gay rights, minority rights, religious rights--have people on all sides trying to legislate their particular morality."

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Dusting Off Your Bible

I am currently going through Spiritual Disciplines for the Christian Life by Donald Whitney with a group of upperclassmen at Drexel. His first chapter focuses on the importance of Bible intake.

Of course we must take in the Word of God! Isn't that obvious? Yet while many Christians, he says, agree that getting fed with Scripture is important, they still know "...little more about the Bible than Third-World Christians who possess not even a shred of Scripture." (pg. 28)

No Spiritual Discipline is more important than the intake of God's Word. Nothing can substitute for it. There simply is no healthy Christian life apart from a diet of the milk and meat of Scripture. The reasons for this are obvious. In the Bible God tells us about Himself, and especially about Jesus Christ, the incarnation of God. The Bible unfolds the Law of God to us and shows us how we've all broken it. There we learn how Christ died as a sinless, willing Substitute for breakers of God's Law and how we must repent and believe in Him to be right with God. In the Bible we learn the ways and will of the Lord. We find in Scripture how to live in a way that is pleasing to God as well as best and most fulfilling for ourselves. Non of this eternally essential information can be found anywhere else except the Bible. Therefore if we would know God and be Godly, we must know the Word of God--intimately. (pg. 28)

More importantly, as my friend leading the study mentioned, the Bible explains why it needs to be read. Paul says in 2 Timothy, "All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work" (3:16-17)

In Him,
Jason